How Do You Approach Tactical Soccer Analysis for Different Teams? (1 Viewer)

markron

New Member
Jan 4, 2024
9
#1
Hey everyone,

I’ve been diving deeper into understanding team tactics and player performances, but I’m curious about how others approach soccer analysis. Do you focus more on data-driven insights, such as xG and heatmaps, or on visual observation and game flow?

I’m especially interested in how analysts adapt their methods when studying teams with contrasting playing styles, such as possession-heavy sides versus counterattacking teams. What tools or frameworks do you use to break down matches effectively?

Any tips or examples would be greatly appreciated!

- - - Updated - - -

Hey everyone,

I’ve been diving deeper into understanding team tactics and player performances, but I’m curious about how others approach soccer analysis. Do you focus more on data-driven insights, such as xG and heatmaps, or on visual observation and game flow?

I’m especially interested in how analysts adapt their methods when studying teams with contrasting playing styles, such as possession-heavy sides versus counterattacking teams. What tools or frameworks do you use to break down matches effectively?

Any tips or examples would be greatly appreciated!
thanks in advance for any help
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
85,675
#2
Data is better than no data. But data won't tell you how often a defender gets caught ball-watching. It won't tell you how badly a striker mistimes their runs ... or fails to make any useful runs at all. Or when a player on a counterattack picks the wrong teammate to attempt a pass to.

I get that with the proliferation of video games, crypto, and vague curiosity about data-overload sports like baseball we're seeing more interest in measuring everything and trying to produce meaning out of it. It adds some color. But it's also a very incomplete picture.

Heatmaps and statistics provide some useful diagnostics to explore. But they can miss the big picture entirely that comes from watching a player facing an opponent in game play.
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
38,719
#3
...But data won't tell you how often a defender gets caught ball-watching. It won't tell you how badly a striker mistimes their runs ... or fails to make any useful runs at all. Or when a player on a counterattack picks the wrong teammate to attempt a pass to...
while i agree with your overall point and i also think that the widely available data only gives us a superficial understanding of the game, opta pro tier is extremely detailed. they record frame by frame position of the ball and every player, so analysts who have access to the complete opta dataset can answer most of what you mentioned. it's just that whoscored, fbref or sofascore won't publish that data so we cannot read that (and even if we could, we're not qualified to understand and assess it)
 

mjromeo81

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2022
1,805
#4
For me, there's just so much that happens on the pitch that I consider to be "non-measurable". How do you quantify leadership, positioning, mental toughness, or decision-making under pressure? These qualities are often what separate good players from great ones, yet they're incredibly hard to capture with numbers.

Football statistics often lack nuance. e.g. what's the context? What's the team dynamic? What specific role is the player asked to perform? Without that understanding, raw stats can be misleading.

Take a simple example: a forward makes a clever run, dragging a defender away and creating space for a teammate to provide an assist to another player who scores. The goal and assist show up on the stat sheet, but not the intelligent off-ball movement that made it all possible. That's why I believe the eye test is still essential. Numbers can support what we see, but they can't replace the understanding that comes from actually watching the game.

If you think that example is silly, then what about Olivier Giroud's role for France at the 2018 World Cup? He went the whole tournament without a single shot on target, despite playing over seven hours. His primary contribution was not scoring, but rather his role as a target man and playmaker, holding up the ball, creating space for teammates like Griezmann and Mbappe.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)