Winter mercato vote (1 Viewer)

Vote


  • Total voters
    39
  • Poll closed .

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
13,564
#4
4 for me
No striker that the cosch asked for
Two stop gap solutions who are massively injury prone.
The only good thing is that we havent committed to any of this transfers, hopefully saving for the summer.
 

Espectro

The Grimreaper
Jul 12, 2002
14,937
#7
Trying to be as impartial as possible (as you know, I'm not a Comolli fan)...

My rating for this transfer window would be a 6,5...

If Spalletti hadn't specifically requested a striker, my rating would probably have changed to an 8.

Holm is a good backup for Kalulu, and Boga is a question mark, but at least he's a safe bet since he's only on loan, and even if we wanted to buy him, he'd be ridiculously cheap.

The main problem is that they didn't bring in what Spalletti specifically asked for.

Once again, I think this would have been resolved if the board had sat down with Spalletti to discuss the transfer market and what we could realistically bring in, and that way Spalletti would have been more "cautious" when making statements.
 

DanielSz

Senior Member
Sep 6, 2014
16,496
#8
Having to rely on David and Openda sucks, another striker with a different profile wouldve helped. Maybe Vlahovic returns but im not relying on that.

Holm deal was good. He will help the right flank

Boga is basically just Yildiz insurance, I doubt hes gonna play much. Maybe Yildiz sees more time in a central role and Boga can get on the field

The real exciting move was Licina. Havent watched him play but everything I’ve read suggests hes a legitimate talent that they want in the first team.
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
39,270
#10
holm - mario swap: all right
rugani, rouhi out: all right
boga in: meh, spalletti does well with attacking players, then again i bet he's not in a good shape
pedro felipe out: i don't like it, at least there's a buyback clause

no striker: 100% inexcusable

at least we avoided turds like icardi. with kolo back it could have been a 5.5, now it's a solid 3/10
 

Siamak

╭∩╮( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╭∩╮
Aug 13, 2013
22,210
#12

mondo1

Senior Member
May 14, 2006
12,690
#13
holm - mario swap: all right
rugani, rouhi out: all right
boga in: meh, spalletti does well with attacking players, then again i bet he's not in a good shape
pedro felipe out: i don't like it, at least there's a buyback clause

no striker: 100% inexcusable

at least we avoided turds like icardi. with kolo back it could have been a 5.5, now it's a solid 3/10
Id still give it a 6/10 cause we didn’t waste money. We didn’t sign absolute trash. Holm is an upgrade to an useless Mario. Boga well… well see how fit he is and if we still need him if he’s fit or our season is already over at that time.

So we added a rotational player to the squad and didn’t lose a useful player and didn’t waste money. More than I expected from the management


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
 

Knowah

Iceman - Pool's Closed Due to Aids
Jan 28, 2013
7,330
#14
pedro felipe out: i don't like it, at least there's a buyback clause
Is there a buyback clause or just a percentage of future sale clause?

The percentage of future sale, like Tarik with Sassuolo, basically gives us a discount on him if he develops on the future. As it stands with Tarik, our 50% of his future sale basically means we can buy him back at 15m if he were to be sold for 30m. That, coupled with a right of matching any bid, would basically give us control over his future if he develops. I don't hate it but would prefer an outright buyback agreement.
 

Bianconero_Aus

Beppe Marotta Is My God
May 26, 2009
84,264
#15
All I will say is maybe UEFA helped us by slapping us with FFP violations, as I feel like we would have wasted money on absolute trash if we were allowed to spend money this window.

At least we only loaned a couple of (admittedly useful) players. Big failure in not securing a striker which was a specific request of the coach.

I’ll say 5/10.
 
Last edited:

JuveJay

Tuchelbanistan
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
77,774
#16
Is there a buyback clause or just a percentage of future sale clause?

The percentage of future sale, like Tarik with Sassuolo, basically gives us a discount on him if he develops on the future. As it stands with Tarik, our 50% of his future sale basically means we can buy him back at 15m if he were to be sold for 30m. That, coupled with a right of matching any bid, would basically give us control over his future if he develops. I don't hate it but would prefer an outright buyback agreement.
L’U.S. Sassuolo Calcio comunica di aver acquisito dalla Juventus, con la formula del prestito con diritto di opzione, contro opzione e diritto di riacquisto a favore della Juventus, le prestazioni sportive del calciatore Pedro Felipe.
 

Knowah

Iceman - Pool's Closed Due to Aids
Jan 28, 2013
7,330
#17
L’U.S. Sassuolo Calcio comunica di aver acquisito dalla Juventus, con la formula del prestito con diritto di opzione, contro opzione e diritto di riacquisto a favore della Juventus, le prestazioni sportive del calciatore Pedro Felipe.
Wow, kind of really good terms for us if I'm being honest.

Buyback, counter buyback, but no percentage of future sale? So Sassuolo can buy him, we can counter their attempt to buy him with a fee of our own, and we get buyback rights on him for an agreed sum.
 

#10

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2002
7,786
#18
Give it a couple of weeks then will vote.

snap reaction is “at least we didn’t buy trash”

would have been nice to add a “big man”, even if it was straight into Next Gen and a backup to first team.

koop and Dusan book values weigh heavy compared to their zero output.
 

JuveJay

Tuchelbanistan
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
77,774
#19
Wow, kind of really good terms for us if I'm being honest.

Buyback, counter buyback, but no percentage of future sale? So Sassuolo can buy him, we can counter their attempt to buy him with a fee of our own, and we get buyback rights on him for an agreed sum.
Yeah all in Juve control which is a nice change. We will obviously have to pay more to buy him back but don't imagine it'll be something huge, and the loaning club should be compensated for their development process of "our" player. We should be looking at this method more often, but it's not always as easy as that to get deals over the line.
 

Knowah

Iceman - Pool's Closed Due to Aids
Jan 28, 2013
7,330
#20
Yeah all in Juve control which is a nice change. We will obviously have to pay more to buy him back but don't imagine it'll be something huge, and the loaning club should be compensated for their development process of "our" player. We should be looking at this method more often, but it's not always as easy as that to get deals over the line.
For all the dislike I have at us getting a director from the French league (and not even a particularly good one), I think he's at least been smarter with out sales and transfers go so far.

Gatti will be the big test for me. Can we get 25-30m from some EPL club for him. We certainly SHOULD be able to if you see the absolute braindead defenders that EPL clubs buy. Also, lowkey, I think it'd be a great move for Gatti. He'd look like a fucking worldclass CB in the EPL lmao
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)