Randal Kolo Muani (11 Viewers)

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
10,477
Calculate his book value, thats probably his value for PSG. Same type of reasoning as every other club
In the summer it should be 57 book value, so he probably could be obtainable for around 50m. But I smell another Exchange ala Arthur and Pjanic between Kolo and Susana.

- - - Updated - - -

It's 54 million this summer.
Transfermarkt says Hus transfer fee was 95m
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
6,964
Why are we looking after players we can’t really afford then! And you keep talking as if in the summer we will have funds but are not taking into account all the options/obligations to buy that we already have schedulled for this next summer, ultimately i guess why don’t we just dry loan everyone from now on seeing as it’s such smart business.

- - - Updated - - -

Just ask yourself this, how much our option/obligation is on Kalulu currently and how much would Milan’s asking price have been next summer after the great season he’s had with us, and apply it to every dry loan too and maybe you’ll see the most relevant point of view here.
I don't talk as if anything will happen this summer. That's where you're reading stuff I'm not typing, I'm afraid. I don't know if we'll have money since CL qualification will be very important in that and it's far from given.

People are already whining about everything, let alone if we'd only be pursuing players that fit our budget. That would be Lloyd Kelly's all over the place.

It's not Kalulu, It's Kolo. Different timing, different value, different situation, different deals. But... When I ask myself that question, I immediately think about Kolo's 54 million book value and it's very difficult to get a raise on that imo... We'll see how it pans out. If he gets us to the CL and leaves that will be a pity for sure. But again; why would PSG insert an option to sell for less than 54 million?

- - - Updated - - -

In the summer it should be 57 book value, so he probably could be obtainable for around 50m. But I smell another Exchange ala Arthur and Pjanic between Kolo and Susana.

- - - Updated - - -


Transfermarkt says Hus transfer fee was 95m
Then it's even 57m idd
 
Last edited:

Alin

FINO ALLA FINE!
Jul 27, 2015
6,213
I don't talk as if anything will happen this summer. That's where you're reading stuff I'm not typing, I'm afraid. I don't know if we'll have money since CL qualification will be very important in that and it's far from given.

People are already whining about everything, let alone if we'd only be pursuing players that fit our budget. That would be Lloyd Kelly's all over the place.

When I ask myself that question, I immediately think about Kolo's 54 million book value and it's very difficult to get a raise on that imo... We'll see how it pans out. If he gets us to the CL and leaves that will be a pity for sure. But again; why would PSG insert an option to sell for less than 54 million?

- - - Updated - - -


Then it's even 57m idd
Tbh to me you seem more concerned about justifying why it wouldn’t make sense for PSG to loan him out any other way than a dry loan more than why it doesn’t make sense for us to only do a dry loan on a player with high potential but that flopped for a PSG team that overpaid massively and has every intention to sell to the highest bidder, and is why i’m worried by it being only a dry loan and him doing great here resulting in us getting outpriced, which is where our points of view differ, despite actually agreeing on other aspects.
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
35,812
Why are we looking after players we can’t really afford then! And you keep talking as if in the summer we will have funds but are not taking into account all the options/obligations to buy that we already have schedulled for this next summer, ultimately i guess why don’t we just dry loan everyone from now on seeing as it’s such smart business.

- - - Updated - - -

Just ask yourself this, how much our option/obligation is on Kalulu currently and how much would Milan’s asking price have been next summer after the great season he’s had with us, and apply it to every dry loan too and maybe you’ll see the most relevant point of view here.
Personally my perspective is wait and see. Both to see if Randal stats sucking because of motta defensive tactics and starts sucking…

But also to see if motta willl be coach. I don’t want obligation to sign because he likely won’t be coach and no point in getting stuck with expensive signing that new coach won’t play with.
 

Alin

FINO ALLA FINE!
Jul 27, 2015
6,213
Personally my perspective is wait and see. Both to see if Randal stats sucking because of motta defensive tactics and starts sucking…

But also to see if motta willl be coach. I don’t want obligation to sign because he likely won’t be coach and no point in getting stuck with expensive signing that new coach won’t play with.
That actually makes a lot of sense tbh, sounds rather plausible and reasonable, might be a perspective that the club applied too when negotiating all this dry loans.
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
6,964
Tbh to me you seem more concerned about justifying why it wouldn’t make sense for PSG to loan him out any other way than a dry loan more than why it doesn’t make sense for us to only do a dry loan on a player with high potential but that flopped for a PSG team that overpaid massively and has every intention to sell to the highest bidder, and is why i’m worried by it being only a dry loan and him doing great here resulting in us getting outpriced, which is where our points of view differ, despite actually agreeing on other aspects.
What I'm concerned about is not the summer (and certainly not creating problems that aren't there yet and where many dynamics we don't know about can influence things) but the here and now. We need the CL. Kolo and Veiga seemvery helpful. Lloyd and Costa (who are the permanent deals) will have to prove that. So I'd say it's more the permanent deals that are a headache in this particular window for me.

Do you know the intentions of PSG now? Don't think so and I don't either. Also there's the will of the player, the very high salary, the Dusan situation, etc. to think about. This is a question mark for everyone.
 

Tak!

Senior Member
Jun 23, 2011
4,157
Personally my perspective is wait and see. Both to see if Randal stats sucking because of motta defensive tactics and starts sucking…

But also to see if motta willl be coach. I don’t want obligation to sign because he likely won’t be coach and no point in getting stuck with expensive signing that new coach won’t play with.
Agree. I do however think he suits Motta because of his pace, he seems dangerous when he can chase down balls. Less dangerous inside the box or when we are in possession.
 
Jul 13, 2010
6,779
I mean if PSG gonna do good with goals for the remainder of the season, Kvaratskhelia be good signing - I don't see why they would not sell him to us for a reduced price

- - - Updated - - -

Agree. I do however think he suits Motta because of his pace, he seems dangerous when he can chase down balls. Less dangerous inside the box or when we are in possession.
and he can control the ball without falling apart or shoot the ball without being blocked, right?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 2, Guests: 5)